data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9d48/a9d486a26dfb82284e8a755d65e9849071438f54" alt="09/12/09"
We Need a BIGGER House [click to read]. Yes, You read him right.
"In Federalist No. 55, James Madison defended the proposed Constitution’s apportionment clause despite its widespread unpopularity. The chief complaints, according to Madison, were that such a small Congress would become an “unsafe depository of the public interests”; that the districts would be too large and diverse for any politician to “possess a proper knowledge of the local circumstances of their numerous constituents”; and that such a tiny House would have the net result of attracting elitist types whose aim would be the “permanent elevation of the few on the depression of the many.”
ht/Drew
No comments:
Post a Comment